Showing posts with label 2024 at 08:51AM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2024 at 08:51AM. Show all posts

Friday, May 17, 2024

Spire Healthcare: Death of NHS-funded private patient raises safety concerns - BBC News

https://ift.tt/cPwvnGH
Spire Healthcare: Death of NHS-funded private patient raises safety concerns - BBC News

Spire Healthcare: Death of NHS-funded private patient raises safety concerns - BBC News

A woman died when a major private healthcare provider failed to transfer her to NHS intensive care quickly enough after she became critically ill.

Sabrina Khan said Spire Healthcare staff "should have known something was wrong" with her mother, Nafisa.

The BBC also obtained testimony from doctors - contracted by the company to work up to 168 hours a week - who say long hours could put patients at risk.

Spire Healthcare has apologised for failings in Nafisa Khan's care.

The death of Mrs Khan from east London is one of several deaths following surgery at Spire Healthcare, looked at by BBC Panorama.

Spire Healthcare, which runs 39 private hospitals across the UK, is one of the biggest private hospital chains.

All surgery, wherever it's carried out, comes with some risk and things can go wrong. Spire has received three Prevention of Future Deaths reports from coroners calling for action in the past two years.

In one case in Norwich, the coroner issued a warning about Spire's continuing reliance on ambulance transfers to NHS hospitals in the event of emergencies, after three patients had died following long waits.

In England alone, there are more than six million people on NHS waiting lists. In some cases the NHS will pay for patients to be treated in private hospitals to help reduce the backlog.

Since 2021, Spire Healthcare has treated more than half a million NHS patients. Last year its profits rose by more than 30% to £126m.

While most NHS hospitals have intensive care units, most private hospitals do not.

BBC Panorama has found evidence that some patients treated in Spire hospitals were unaware there were no intensive care facilities.

Dr Nick Woodier at the Health Services Safety Investigations Body said that "there is a risk to patient safety", particularly where the NHS does not understand the capabilities of a particular private hospital.

Following Panorama's questions to Spire, the company has now updated its hospital websites, informing patients they may need to be transferred to the NHS for intensive care.

Spire Healthcare says it communicates with patients about its facilities "in various ways including information on our website, admission letters and patient leaflets", which are "regularly updated as appropriate".

When ambulance staff eventually arrived to take Nafisa Khan to an NHS hospital, daughter Sabrina says Spire Healthcare's east London hospital had so few staff on duty that the cleaners let them in.

After having been referred to Spire, Mrs Khan underwent a routine gallbladder operation in September 2021. She had been told it would be quicker for the NHS to pay for the procedure to be done privately.

The morning after her surgery, Mrs Khan deteriorated and her condition became critical. Spire has five hospitals with critical care units, but Spire East London does not have one.

Mrs Khan's family say the ambulance to take her to an NHS hospital did not arrive until about 22:00 that night.

"Why did they wait that whole Saturday while she was deteriorating, while she was vomiting, to transfer her to the NHS hospital?" said Sabrina.

Mrs Khan died shortly after being taken into NHS intensive care.

Spire Healthcare has admitted it failed to fully appreciate the seriousness of Mrs Khan's deteriorating condition and has apologised.

It said she should have been transferred earlier to an NHS hospital for critical care.

In 2023, Spire Healthcare was warned about another death as part of a coroner's Prevention of Future Deaths report. These are issued when someone has died and action needs to be taken to reduce the risk of further deaths occurring in the future.

At another Spire Hospital, in Leeds, a woman had developed sepsis - a life-threatening reaction to an infection - after a routine hernia operation.

The hospital was late in identifying the complications and the woman died. The coroner concluded her death had been avoidable and highlighted the role of the on-call doctor, known as the resident medical officer (RMO).

"The RMO was called twice during the night but failed to appreciate that the deterioration in her condition necessitated an escalation to the surgeon or anaesthetist," the coroner said.

Resident medical officers, now called resident doctors, provide 24-hour cover at private hospitals. In some private hospitals, including Spire, these doctors are contracted to work up to 168 hours a week.

Panorama - NHS Patients Going Private: What Are the Risks?

With more than six million people in England alone waiting for an operation on the NHS, Monika Plaha investigates patient safety at one of the UK's biggest private healthcare providers.

Watch now on BBC iPlayer (UK Only)

This may mean they work from 09:00 to 17:00 and then are on call until the following morning, when they work a day shift again and then repeat the pattern across a week.

Since 2009, the NHS has said its doctors should not work on average more than 48 hours a week.

Panorama has obtained the testimony of 28 resident medical officers who worked at Spire until 2022 and who want to remain anonymous. Almost all of them expressed concern about their workload and the potential safety implications for patients.

One said: "I was working round the clock, being the only doctor at night. Feeling constantly burnt out. And this obviously is not safe for the patients, nor for me as a doctor."

"I constantly had concerns about patient safety in the Spire hospital," said another.

Spire Healthcare told Panorama the wellbeing of all its staff is of "paramount importance" and said it has since updated its working practices.

The company said it has "robust safeguards to ensure that resident doctors are well supported" and are "only working when adequately rested".

Spire Healthcare was previously caught up in a major medical scandal when rogue surgeon Ian Paterson - who worked mostly in the NHS as well as for Spire - was jailed in 2017 for carrying out more than 1,000 unnecessary operations on women.

Then in 2018, another Spire surgeon, Michael Walsh, was suspended after dozens of patients complained about him. Spire referred Walsh to the regulator, the General Medical Council. Walsh denied any wrongdoing and later took himself off the medical register before his case was completed.

After three deaths in less than a year at the Spire Norwich Hospital, a coroner raised concerns about the company relying on NHS ambulance services in the event of medical emergencies.

In 2022, Geoffrey Hoad, 85, was in severe pain and needed a hip replacement. He decided to pay for surgery at Spire Norwich because of the two-year NHS waiting list.

The operation appeared to go well. Mr Hoad had coronary artery disease. Though he was a higher-risk patient, Spire says he was well enough to be treated at its hospital.

Over the next couple of days his condition deteriorated.

His wife, Anne McDowell, said she had "no idea at all" that the hospital did not have its own intensive care unit. An ambulance to take him just a mile down the road to the Norwich and Norfolk University Hospitals NHS Trust took 14 hours to arrive.

After he was eventually transferred to the NHS, Mr Hoad suffered a heart attack. The consultant told Ms McDowell her husband would not recover.

At an inquest last September, while the coroner didn't say the delay had contributed to Mr Hoad's death, she did issue a Prevention of Future Deaths report. She found that by continuing to rely on the NHS ambulance service, Spire had not learned the lessons from Mr Hoad's death and two previous deaths.

In 2021, two patients undergoing routine operations at Spire Norwich died after their conditions deteriorated. They also faced long ambulance delays to transfer them to the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Trust.

East of England Ambulance service has apologised to the three families for the delayed transfers. It said response times have improved significantly since these tragic cases.

Spire Healthcare said transferring patients after operations is "an extremely rare occurrence, and long delays are even rarer".

It said it continues to "work closely with the ambulance service and local NHS trusts on ways to ease delays".

The company said that "ensuring patients are safe is at the heart" of what it does, and that 98% of its hospitals are rated "good" or "outstanding".

The Department of Health and Social Care says since the Paterson Inquiry "key actions have been taken to strengthen protections for patients receiving care from independent sector providers".

Related Topics

NHS to expand private sector use to tackle waits

Use private sector more for NHS patients - Labour

Surgeon wounded hundreds amid 'culture of denial'

Surgeon facing 'serious' allegations quits medical register

Top Stories

Heated exchanges as Trump lawyer questions Stormy Daniels

Israel takes Rafah crossing as truce talks continue

Russian plot to kill Zelensky foiled, Kyiv says

Features

Russia's modern-day tsar sworn in for fifth term

26 of the most eye-catching looks from the Met Gala

'Shattered' - Tributes to surfers killed in Mexico

Indians brave scorching temperatures to vote

Weary troops stuck on front line as Ukraine struggles to find manpower

French bakers beat longest baguette world record. VideoFrench bakers beat longest baguette world record

Falklands still British, admits Argentina leader

Acclaimed photographer cracks Instagram in his 80s

The rise of Sweden's super rich

Elsewhere on the BBC

How Friends became one of the biggest comedies of all time

Executive producer Kevin Bright reveals how the ever-popular show was born

Tony Mammoth is a man out of time, literally

Frozen in 1979, he gets a second chance at life. Surely things can't have changed that much?

The women in music who have shaped Courtney Love

The American singer-songwriter shares the soundtrack to her life

The rookies are pushed to their personal and professional limits

Watch the new series of the tense Belfast-based police drama

Most Read

© 2024 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.


Spire Healthcare: Death of NHS-funded private patient raises safety concerns - BBC News</2>

Sunday, May 12, 2024

Grantham: Award for 'incredible' octogenarian foster carers - BBC News

https://ift.tt/khRrQd0
Grantham: Award for 'incredible' octogenarian foster carers - BBC News

Grantham: Award for 'incredible' octogenarian foster carers - BBC News

A couple in their 80s who have fostered more than 150 children say they have no plans to retire.

Margaret Isdale and her husband Robert, from Grantham, Lincolnshire, took in their first child in 1978.

They have been given a lifetime achievement award to mark their decades of dedication to families.

Asked how they continue to care for newborns, Mrs Isdale laughed: "I don't know! We just enjoy doing it, and I can't imagine not doing it now."

The couple, who have been married for 58 years and have two children of their own, are currently caring for an eight-month-old baby.

Mr Isdale, 81, said of their award: "It's really quite humbling. It's not about us, it's about the kids we look after - they're the important ones."

Paying tribute to them, Michelle Sawmynaden, from Lincolnshire Fostering Service, said she was "in awe of them both".

She added: "Their dedication to the fostering service over 46 years has been absolutely incredible.

"The difference they've made to the children's lives has been fantastic. Lots of those children have either gone back to their birth families or gone on to be adopted."

Explaining their decision to foster, Mr Isdale said: "You're there to give them an interim period of safety, to allow them to experience being part of a family."

The couple can still remember the first child they cared for - a 14-year-old girl.

She stayed with them for just a week before being returned to her birth parents, they recalled.

Over the years, they have looked after children with a range of needs, including a boy who underwent a kidney transplant. Mr and Mrs Isdale spent weeks in hospital by his bedside.

They said one child came to them with just a single set of pyjamas.

'Keep in touch'

The husband and wife team agreed the most rewarding part of fostering was reuniting families.

Mr Isdale said: "People say, how can you hand them over? Well, that's part of what we do, and sometimes when you hand [a child] over the adoptive parents or birth parents keep in touch and they say how appreciative they are. That in itself is a reward."

Recently, the couple were asked to be the godparents of a girl they had cared for.

In 1987, the Isdales adopted a girl after three years caring for her as foster parents.

"She just grew on us," said Mrs Isdale, 80.

Kim was born with Down's syndrome and a complex heart condition.

When she was born doctors said she would not live beyond nine months. She died in 2005, aged 21. The family travelled all over the world with her.

Mr Isdale said: "She taught us a lot. She was lovely, she had a good sense of humour, and she went everywhere with us."

Both said they had no plans to retire from fostering, insisting they would continue caring for children as long as their health allowed them to.

According to Lincolnshire Fostering Service, there are 213 approved fostering households and 768 children in the county's care system.

Further details about becoming a foster carer can be found here.

Follow BBC Lincolnshire onFacebook, X (formerly Twitter), and Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastyorkslincs.news@bbc.co.uk

Related Topics

Mum says depression inspired her to foster

Cash incentive scheme for foster carers extended

Foster families take part in Easter support event

Film in Parliament highlights UK's lack of foster care

Related Internet Links

Lincolnshire Fostering Service

From other local news sites

7 £4.1 million project on town centre market place starts

3 Plans to install CCTV at historic hall

Teenage traders display their wares at market event in Sleaford

More than 7,000 potholes filled last month but still more to be done

1 A sell out show for popular market event

Warm welcome for Walk of Hope at Caistor

Top Stories

Heated exchanges as Trump lawyer questions Stormy Daniels

Israel takes Rafah crossing as truce talks continue

Russian plot to kill Zelensky foiled, Kyiv says

Features

Russia's modern-day tsar sworn in for fifth term

26 of the most eye-catching looks from the Met Gala

'Shattered' - Tributes to surfers killed in Mexico

Indians brave scorching temperatures to vote

Weary troops stuck on front line as Ukraine struggles to find manpower

French bakers beat longest baguette world record. VideoFrench bakers beat longest baguette world record

Falklands still British, admits Argentina leader

Acclaimed photographer cracks Instagram in his 80s

The rise of Sweden's super rich

Elsewhere on the BBC

How Friends became one of the biggest comedies of all time

Executive producer Kevin Bright reveals how the ever-popular show was born

Tony Mammoth is a man out of time, literally

Frozen in 1979, he gets a second chance at life. Surely things can't have changed that much?

The women in music who have shaped Courtney Love

The American singer-songwriter shares the soundtrack to her life

The rookies are pushed to their personal and professional limits

Watch the new series of the tense Belfast-based police drama

Most Read

© 2024 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.


Grantham: Award for 'incredible' octogenarian foster carers - BBC News</2>

Tuesday, May 7, 2024

'Forever Chemicals' Set to Be Removed From Tap Water. Here's What to Know - CNETinstagramyoutubetiktokfacebookxflipboard

https://cnet.co/3wgFMvh
'Forever Chemicals' Set to Be Removed From Tap Water. Here's What to Know - CNETinstagramyoutubetiktokfacebookxflipboard

'Forever Chemicals' Set to Be Removed From Tap Water. Here's What to Know - CNETinstagramyoutubetiktokfacebookxflipboard

Our wellness advice is expert-vetted. Our top picks are based on our editors’ independent research, analysis, and hands-on testing. If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Reviews ethics statement

'Forever Chemicals' Set to Be Removed From Tap Water. Here's What to Know

A new rule aims to reduce exposure to PFAS, which have been linked to health problems. Here's what we know about PFAS in water and other products.

A few years down the road, your tap water could be a little healthier for you. The US Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday announced a finalized rule from the Biden administration requiring public water systems test for and reduce the levels of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances in drinking water. 

PFAS are also called "forever chemicals" because of the way they build up in the environment and people's bodies. 

About a year ago, the EPA announced plans for the first-ever national standard. As it rolls into effect over the next several years, it will require about 6% to 10% of the 66,000 public drinking water systems affected to reduce their levels of PFAS, the EPA estimates.  All public water systems have three years to complete their initial monitoring for PFAS and must "implement solutions" within five years if PFAS are too high. 

PFAS are chemicals in products and coatings that resist heat, so they're commonly found in clothes, furniture, food containers and personal care products. They're a concern, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, because they don't break down in the environment. So they move through soil, contaminate drinking water and build up in wildlife and animals -- including most people in the US. 

How PFAS affect health 

Like most potentially harmful chemicals or elements in our environment, the concern is over prolonged exposure (years) or larger amounts of exposure that increases the risk of negative health effects. 

Some health effects that may be linked to higher levels of PFAS include increased cholesterol, changes to the liver, increased risk of certain cancers, low birth weight, high blood pressure in pregnancy and even decreased vaccine response. They may also interfere with the body's hormones and impact fertility. 

Young children and those who are pregnant may be more susceptible to PFAS than the general population, as are some industrial workers whose jobs have them around certain chemicals. To check for water contamination in your area, you can use the Environmental Working Group's ZIP code search feature.

The CDC notes that the health risks of humans exposed to lower levels of PFAS are uncertain and that finding a detectable level of it in a blood serum sample doesn't mean you'll develop health effects. 

The agency also notes that US production of two types of PFAS -- PFOA and PFOS -- has declined since the early 2000s but that people may be exposed to different types of PFAS as they're replaced. 

Read more: That Old Nonstick Skillet May Be Unsafe. How to Tell

What will the drinking water rule do? 

The new rule, which is the first legally enforceable national drinking water standard, will set a limit at 4 parts per trillion of the widely used and studied PFOA and PFOS, a level which is "lowest levels that are feasible for effective implementation," the EPA said in a press release. Standards for PFAS called PFNA, PFHxS and HFPO-DA (also called "GenX Chemicals") will be set at 10 parts per trillion, and there's also a rule for mixing PFAS. 

Water or utility systems will have to abide by these standards. 

While some money has been allocated through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to help states and territories pay for and implement testing, as the EPA outlined this week in its announcement, The New York Times reported water utilities are concerned about funding to comply with the standard. 

Groups like the EWG have been calling for more federal regulation of PFAS levels for years and have proposed limits that are significantly lower than what's currently set at the national level. However, states or cities may set their own levels and water filtration rules for PFAS. 

The coating on nonstick pans is another source for trace amounts of PFAS, which build up over time. 

When will it be in effect? 

It still may be a while before people start drinking water with less PFAS contamination. According to the EPA press release, public water systems have three years to "complete their initial monitoring for these chemicals" and then let the public know the level of PFAS in the community's drinking water. They have a total of five years to "implement solutions" that would bring the PFAS level down to the acceptable level.

After it's all said and done, this new rule could reduce PFAS exposure for approximately 100 million people, the EPA and Biden administration say. However, as The New York Times notes, legal challenges to the rule could potentially delay or interfere with its effect.

Will my water filter work? What products contain PFAS? 

If you use one of the popular activated carbon filters (like a Brita pitcher, for example) it might not remove PFAS as effectively or consistently as a reverse osmosis filter -- a more expensive and involved filter that typically fits under your sink, according to 2020 research from Duke University. 

The Public Health and Safety Organization has a list of water treatment units and the claims the company makes about what they can remove. And as the CDC says, the best way to figure out what a home water filter filters out is to look for the NSF certification on the label. 

While water is one main source of potential exposure to PFAS (since we need to drink it every day to live), drinking more purified water isn't the only way you can reduce exposure to PFAS. Because the chemicals are found in nonstick or repellent materials, switching out nonstick pans for stainless steel or cast iron cookware may also reduce the risk. You can also try not to use water-resistant sprays, stain-resistant carpets and anything else that might be coated with those chemicals. 

PFAS may be intentionally added to cosmetic products to "condition and smooth the skin," according to the US Food and Drug Administration, so some types of makeup, shaving cream, lotion and more products may contain them. What's more, things as simple as dental floss, shampoo and to-go containers all may expose people to PFAS, which are widespread in the US.

If you're interested in doing a deeper dive into cosmetic or personal care ingredients, the EWG has a page where you can look up personal care products and see how their ingredients are rated for potential contamination concerns. But when doing a deep dive into ingredients like this, it's always important to keep in mind the benefits of the products you're using -- reducing the risk of skin cancer with sunscreen, for one example, or treating painfully dry skin with lotion. 

Other Wellness Guides


'Forever Chemicals' Set to Be Removed From Tap Water. Here's What to Know - CNETinstagramyoutubetiktokfacebookxflipboard</2>